Draft Presidential Regulation Envisages Mandatory Annual Legal Audits for Businesses and Other Entities
A draft presidential regulation (“Draft”) introduced in July will, if eventually promulgated in its present form, require every Indonesian business entity (badan usaha), legal entity (badan hukum), and public entity (badan publik) to undergo an annual legal audit to assess the legality of the entity and its actions, including its levels of legal compliance and good corporate governance.
Detailed information has yet to be provided on the scope of the envisaged legal audit requirement, audit procedures, how detailed an audit should be, or the consequences of an adverse audit opinion. These and other matters are expected to be addressed in implementing regulations. However, it is clear that what is envisaged has the potential to be burdensome for many businesses in terms of both time and money.
What do we know so far?
As regards the private sector, what we know based on the Draft may be summarized as follows:
A business or legal entity is required to have a legal audit conducted every year. If it fails to appoint a legal auditor of its own accord to do so, then a legal auditor may be appointed by the Minister.
Just as in the case of a financial audit, the findings of a legal audit should be set out in an opinion issued by the legal auditor, who must be certified by the Minister of Law and Human Rights (“Minister”).
The Draft describes the general processes involved in a legal audit, encompassing:
- Identification of audit’s purpose and parameters;
- Planning and confirmation of audit;
- Collecting information;
- Assessment and review of information; and
- Writing-up and submitting the audit report.
Other requirements under the Draft are as follows:
|
Legal & Business Entities
|
Public Institutions |
Initiator |
The entity
|
The Minister |
Implementer |
Audit to be conducted by a legal auditor certified as such by the Minister (“Legal Auditor”)
|
Audit to be conducted by a civil servant authorized to carry out legal analysis and evaluation.
|
Frequency |
Annually, or based on a complaint, in which case the Minister may assign a legal auditor to conduct an audit.
|
Annually |
Submission of legal audit report
|
To the Minister, copied to the audited entity for follow-up action. |
To the Minister, copied to the audited public institution
|
Post-audit follow-up |
The entity must implement the audit recommendations and submit a report on follow-up action to the Minister
|
The public institution must take follow-up action based on the auditor’s opinion and recommendations |
Submission of report on post-audit follow-up |
Required from the entity to the Minister (and other relevant authorities) at year-end |
None, but the Minister is authorized to supervise implementation of follow-up action |
The Draft further provides that a failure by a business or legal entity to comply with its legal-audit obligations will be subject to sanctions. As to what these might be, the Draft rather vaguely states that they shall be “in accordance with the laws and regulations in effect.”
ABNR Commentary
The Draft forms part of a broader (long-running) effort to improve legal compliance in Indonesia by both private and public organizations. It introduces an entirely new, and potentially costly, bureaucratic requirement for businesses, on top of their existing reporting obligations to the Ministry of Law and Human Rights, the Investment Coordinating Board / Badan Koordinasi Penanaman Modal (BKPM), and other agencies, as the case may be. However, insufficient information is available to date to vouchsafe just how burdensome / costly the new legal-audit requirement is likely to be. We will have to wait for the regulation to be promulgated and its implementing regulations issued before this becomes clear. In the meantime, we will keep you updated as regards any changes or additions to the Draft.
By partners Mr. Emir Nurmansyah (enurmansyah@abnrlaw.com), Ms. Chandrawati Dewi (cdewi@abnrlaw.com), and Mr. Maher Sasongko (msasongko@abnrlaw.com) and senior associate Ms. Yohanna Fifinella (yfifinella@abnrlaw.com).
This ABNR News and its contents are intended solely to provide a general overview, for informational purposes, of selected recent developments in Indonesian law. They do not constitute legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Accordingly, ABNR accepts no liability of any kind in respect of any statement, opinion, view, error, or omission that may be contained in this legal update. In all circumstances, you are strongly advised to consult a licensed Indonesian legal practitioner before taking any action that could adversely affect your rights and obligations under Indonesian law.
More Legal Updates
- 09 Apr 2025 A Comparative Review of Insurance Company Liquidation Procedures applicable under 2015 regulations as against the latest regulatory updates that were introduced in 2024
- 25 Mar 2025 Danantara and the Future of SOEs: What will change?
- 11 Mar 2025 OJK Unveils New Regulation to Strengthen Issuers and Public Companies
- 04 Mar 2025 The 200 Club: Indonesia's Most Influential Lawyers by Hukumonline
- 21 Feb 2025 Redefining the Principle of Utmost Good Faith: Judicial Review on Article 251 of the Indonesian Commercial Code
- 14 Feb 2025 OJK Reg. 36/2024: What’s Changing for Insurance Operations?
NEWS DETAIL
23 Sep 2024
Draft Presidential Regulation Envisages Mandatory Annual Legal Audits for Businesses and Other Entities
A draft presidential regulation (“Draft”) introduced in July will, if eventually promulgated in its present form, require every Indonesian business entity (badan usaha), legal entity (badan hukum), and public entity (badan publik) to undergo an annual legal audit to assess the legality of the entity and its actions, including its levels of legal compliance and good corporate governance.
Detailed information has yet to be provided on the scope of the envisaged legal audit requirement, audit procedures, how detailed an audit should be, or the consequences of an adverse audit opinion. These and other matters are expected to be addressed in implementing regulations. However, it is clear that what is envisaged has the potential to be burdensome for many businesses in terms of both time and money.
What do we know so far?
As regards the private sector, what we know based on the Draft may be summarized as follows:
A business or legal entity is required to have a legal audit conducted every year. If it fails to appoint a legal auditor of its own accord to do so, then a legal auditor may be appointed by the Minister.
Just as in the case of a financial audit, the findings of a legal audit should be set out in an opinion issued by the legal auditor, who must be certified by the Minister of Law and Human Rights (“Minister”).
The Draft describes the general processes involved in a legal audit, encompassing:
- Identification of audit’s purpose and parameters;
- Planning and confirmation of audit;
- Collecting information;
- Assessment and review of information; and
- Writing-up and submitting the audit report.
Other requirements under the Draft are as follows:
|
Legal & Business Entities
|
Public Institutions |
Initiator |
The entity
|
The Minister |
Implementer |
Audit to be conducted by a legal auditor certified as such by the Minister (“Legal Auditor”)
|
Audit to be conducted by a civil servant authorized to carry out legal analysis and evaluation.
|
Frequency |
Annually, or based on a complaint, in which case the Minister may assign a legal auditor to conduct an audit.
|
Annually |
Submission of legal audit report
|
To the Minister, copied to the audited entity for follow-up action. |
To the Minister, copied to the audited public institution
|
Post-audit follow-up |
The entity must implement the audit recommendations and submit a report on follow-up action to the Minister
|
The public institution must take follow-up action based on the auditor’s opinion and recommendations |
Submission of report on post-audit follow-up |
Required from the entity to the Minister (and other relevant authorities) at year-end |
None, but the Minister is authorized to supervise implementation of follow-up action |
The Draft further provides that a failure by a business or legal entity to comply with its legal-audit obligations will be subject to sanctions. As to what these might be, the Draft rather vaguely states that they shall be “in accordance with the laws and regulations in effect.”
ABNR Commentary
The Draft forms part of a broader (long-running) effort to improve legal compliance in Indonesia by both private and public organizations. It introduces an entirely new, and potentially costly, bureaucratic requirement for businesses, on top of their existing reporting obligations to the Ministry of Law and Human Rights, the Investment Coordinating Board / Badan Koordinasi Penanaman Modal (BKPM), and other agencies, as the case may be. However, insufficient information is available to date to vouchsafe just how burdensome / costly the new legal-audit requirement is likely to be. We will have to wait for the regulation to be promulgated and its implementing regulations issued before this becomes clear. In the meantime, we will keep you updated as regards any changes or additions to the Draft.
By partners Mr. Emir Nurmansyah (enurmansyah@abnrlaw.com), Ms. Chandrawati Dewi (cdewi@abnrlaw.com), and Mr. Maher Sasongko (msasongko@abnrlaw.com) and senior associate Ms. Yohanna Fifinella (yfifinella@abnrlaw.com).
This ABNR News and its contents are intended solely to provide a general overview, for informational purposes, of selected recent developments in Indonesian law. They do not constitute legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Accordingly, ABNR accepts no liability of any kind in respect of any statement, opinion, view, error, or omission that may be contained in this legal update. In all circumstances, you are strongly advised to consult a licensed Indonesian legal practitioner before taking any action that could adversely affect your rights and obligations under Indonesian law.